Debian vs FreeBSD (was Re: Re: [buug] cockroaches and kernel build)

Keith Keller kkeller at speakeasy.net
Wed Aug 7 21:15:43 PDT 2002


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 08:14:28PM -0400, Karshi wrote:
> I think none of Linux version is complete OS and probably never will be .
> FreeBSD is complete and much stable ( and fast) than any linux . I don't
> see anything  specail about Debian, for example,
> I would prefer Gentoo as a best linux version.

Allow me to plug Slackware 8.1.01, which is a bit more mature than
Gentoo, but less crufty than distros like Debian or the likes of
RedHat and Company.  (A fair number of people I know who have used
*BSD have said that Slackware is the closest to BSD they've seen
in a linux distro.)

- --keith

- -- 
kkeller at speakeasy.net
public key:  http://wombat.san-francisco.ca.us/kkeller/kkeller.asc
alt.os.linux.slackware FAQ:  http://wombat.san-francisco.ca.us/perl/fom

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAj1R8G4ACgkQhVcNCxZ5ID9PbwCfa/ik6dedx6Ok11Z0uHqKmorI
CfsAni0pp13Vlc6C+O1J3tbYRMZubPaG
=SD/i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the buug mailing list