[buug] dhcp

[johnd]

yea, but I'm not doing name based virtual hosts or I would have
not been trying to get an ip in the first place

it uses ssl and needs an ip

our dhcp servers lets you get an ip and give a name to resolve with


On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 02:30:20PM -0700, f.johan.beisser wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Bob Read wrote:
> 
> > Why not use static IPs then?
> > Otherwise, how are you going to configure httpd.conf
> > (or DNS for that matter)?
> 
> host name based virtual hosts don't need IP addresses to be bound to. it's
> part of the http spec to enable them just on name resolution.
> 
> BUT, apache throws a fit if it can't resolve the hostname it is supposed
> to have as a virtual host in this case.
> 
> i generally advocate host name based virtual hosts.
> 
> -------/ f. johan beisser /--------------------------------------+
> 	The other day I asked former Yankees pitcher Jim Bouton
>         what he thought of our great victory over Iraq, and he
>         said, "Mohammed Ali versus Mr. Rogers."
> 		-- kurt vonnegut, 5.9.03

-- 
I'd rather have a gun and never need it, than need one... and never have it.