[buug] Re: LINUX/UNIX job(s) (inside track, ...)

[Michael Paoli]

%s/2006-04/2007-04/g

Those should have indicated 2007, not 2006.

references:
http://www.weak.org/pipermail/buug/2007-April/002931.html

Quoting Michael Paoli:

> LINUX/UNIX job(s) (inside track, ...)
> 
> At least one, and possibly two LINUX/UNIX jobs that I know of, ...
> "inside track" and all that ...
> 
> First, at my present employer (I just joined them 2006-04-09), there
> is this opening:
> http://www.babycenter.com/about/jobs/listing/1518360
> I'll probably know a lot more about the position next month when the
> hiring manager returns from vacation.  It would be right along with
> myself and co-workers as part of a small LINUX/UNIX systems
> administrators team.  Some of the information I've gotten suggests
> they're looking for roughly a mid-level (not sr., not jr.) LINUX/UNIX
> systems administrator - but again, I'll probably know more about that
> next month.  In the meantime, if you want to get your resume queued up,
> or have some questions about the environment and company (which I'm
> quickly well learning; one can also get lots of information about the
> company and what they do by poking around their web sites a fair bit),
> you can e-mail me at work.  For the work e-mail address, apply rot13 to:
> zcnbyv at onolpragre.pbz
> or use tr '[a-zA-Z]' '[n-za-mN-ZA-M]'
> And the primary location for that would be in San Francisco (fairly
> close to CalTrain and the ballpark).
> 
> And secondly, at least in theory there's a position with my former
> employer in an environment I am very familiar with (I was there through
> 2006-04-06).  I'm still awaiting official word when (and presumably if)
> that position opens to external candidates.  Theoretically that
> happens 2007-04-10, but last I heard it's waiting on the requisite
> approval of (my former team lead's manger's manager's manager ... or
> perhaps even further up the chain).  Anyway, I'll provide an update on
> that when (/if) I get confirmation that it's been opened to external
> candidates.