[buug] SSL Signing for multiple Virtual Hosts
Wm. F. Honeycutt
bill.honeycutt at gmail.com
Wed Feb 25 11:46:30 PST 2009
This is, indeed, namebased, so we could simply use one host to
establish the connection and then redirect.
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Johan Beisser <jb at caustic.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Wm. F. Honeycutt
> <bill.honeycutt at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Which of the "offerings" from Network Associates should the client
>> choose? Wildcard or two individual Single certs? "Extended
>> Validation" costs more, but it turns the address bar green, so I'm
>> recommending that they bite down and pony up for EV.
> Go with a wildcard. Due to how https works, the encryption goes
> through before the virtual host is processed or requested. Unless, of
> course, you have an IP based virtual host in the same system.
More information about the buug