[buug] learning shell (Shell book), etc. - objectives?
Michael.Paoli at cal.berkeley.edu
Thu May 5 18:16:33 PDT 2011
Unix/Linux is quite relevant for many areas, shell is or may be rather
to quite relevant for many areas too. Can you say a bit more about
objectives, or what you hope to find/achieve, or what you wish to
have/find in such book(s) you seek? Perhaps a bit more about what you
did/didn't like in the book(s) you've looked at so far.
Besides myself, there are probably many on this list that may be able
to make some excellent recommendations - but it would likely help if we
better knew what you were more/most specifically interested in, and
perhaps also what type(s)/style(s) of books you find more - and less -
useful/effective for you (not everyone likes or prefers the same style
or type of book - different approaches and materials often work
differently for various folks).
Also, disclaimer :-) ... I've read *very* few shell books (close to
zero), so I'm probably not best one to make recommendation on *shell*
books. I've read many Unix/Linux and related books - but there are
also many such books I've also not read - many of which may also be
good/excellent. (In more recent years, I'm typically mostly reading
various bits of reference materials, articles, and the like, rather
than entire books on such topics ... though there are exceptions, and
sometimes I also use suitable books for reference or to clarify
points/areas that aren't otherwise documented or very well documented).
> From: "Karen Hogoboom" <khogoboom at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: learning shell (Shell book), etc.
> Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 16:24:59 -0700
> Michael, please tell me which book on UNIX you recommend if you have the
> time and if you still think it's relevant. I took a look at Ian's book, but
> it's not the type of reference book that I find useful. O'Reilly is not as
> good as it used to be.
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Michael Paoli <
> Michael.Paoli at cal.berkeley.edu> wrote:
>> Oh, there are definitely books on the topic, ... many, ... even
>> rather/quite good ones.
>> The reason I often/typically start folks with Bourne sh(1) from UNIX
>> Seventh Edition (quoting myself):
>> o most of what one needs to use for scripting/programming purposes
>> exists in ye olde (UNIX Seventh Edition) Bourne Shell, and still
>> functions essentially the same way
>> o Very concise reference: UNIX Seventh Edition sh(1) only 6 pages!
>> If one wants more concise materials on shell than an entire book, one
>> might also consider books on Unix, Linux or BSD or systems
>> administration of same. Such books will often have a chapter on the
>> shell and shell programming.
>> 1. http://www.rawbw.com/~mp/unix/sh/#Why_start_here
>> From: "Karen Hogoboom" <khogoboom at gmail.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [buug] Shell book
>>> Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:09:31 -0700
>> Thanks Ian. I would be interested in taking a look at it. I'm planning to
>>> be at the next meeting.
>>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Ian Zimmerman <itz at buug.org> wrote:
>>> Hi, this is the book I mentioned at the last meeting. It is a bit
>>>> similar to the Kernighan & Pike but much updated and extended.
>>>> Again, I can loan it to you if you're interested.
> Karen L. Hogoboom
More information about the buug