[buug] Managing without CUPS
Tony Godshall
togo at of.net
Fri Sep 7 15:53:17 PDT 2012
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Ian Zimmerman <itz at buug.org> wrote:
>
> At the meeting tonight I mentioned that I no longer use the buggy &
> bloated CUPS spooler for printing, or any other spooler. Instead, I
> pass input files through a foomatic-rip pipeline directly to the printer
> port on a printer server machine, subject only to a UUCP-like locking
> protocol.
>
> Here are the 2 scripts involved:
Might be worth trying to revive PDQ
http://www.faqs.org/docs/Linux-HOWTO/Printing-HOWTO.html#PDQ-WHICH-SPOOLER
http://www.faqs.org/docs/Linux-HOWTO/Printing-HOWTO.html#PDQ-OVERVIEW
which Rick says stagnated around 2006:
http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Debian/printing-setup.html
Perhaps your Python script could be generalized
and and made GUI friendly and published as
a modern PDQ rewrite. On the other hand,
googling PDQ with various printer-related terms
indicates that the name has gotten too overloaded.
(e.g. "Founded in 1976, PDQ Printing is Northern
California's largest quick printer...")
DCUPS might be more unique but it would be
a poor choice unless you made some humorous
reference to Microsoft-inspired gender insensitivity ...
http://linux.slashdot.org/story/12/07/19/1923200/microsoft-apologizes-for-inserting-naughty-phrase-into-linux-kernel
noqp is certainly simple to type, but it doesnt
exacly roll off the tongue. Suppose it might
do.
Anyway, thanks for posting your scripts!
More information about the buug
mailing list