From itz at buug.org Thu Aug 4 09:50:13 2016 From: itz at buug.org (Ian Zimmerman) Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 09:50:13 -0700 Subject: [buug] GPG signing? Message-ID: <20160804164736.6616.14F27334@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> I'd like to add a new ID to my existing GPG key and have it signed by a few well-connected folks. I'll bring the requisite information to the BUUG meeting tonight, and I'd also welcome hints on how to meet more signers. i -- Please *no* private Cc: on mailing lists and newsgroups Why does the arrow on Hillary signs point to the right? From Michael.Paoli at cal.berkeley.edu Thu Aug 4 23:36:48 2016 From: Michael.Paoli at cal.berkeley.edu (Michael Paoli) Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 23:36:48 -0700 Subject: [buug] GPG signing? In-Reply-To: <20160804164736.6616.14F27334@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> References: <20160804164736.6616.14F27334@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> Message-ID: <20160804233648.13146vakqe1zo1es@webmail.rawbw.com> Sorry I wasn't able to make it ... earlier today was hoping I would. There is also, biglumber.com, and also the Bay Area Keysigning list: http://zer0.org/mailman/listinfo/ba-keysign/ > From: "Ian Zimmerman" > Subject: [buug] GPG signing? > Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 09:50:13 -0700 > I'd like to add a new ID to my existing GPG key and have it signed by a > few well-connected folks. I'll bring the requisite information to the > BUUG meeting tonight, and I'd also welcome hints on how to meet more > signers. > > i > > -- > Please *no* private Cc: on mailing lists and newsgroups > Why does the arrow on Hillary signs point to the right? > _______________________________________________ > buug mailing list > buug at buug.org > http://buug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/buug > From itz at buug.org Sat Aug 6 19:31:22 2016 From: itz at buug.org (Ian Zimmerman) Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 19:31:22 -0700 Subject: [buug] Test! Message-ID: <20160807023008.23840.3AEF6D88@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> This posting is different. Will it matter to the list manager? -- Please *no* private Cc: on mailing lists and newsgroups Why does the arrow on Hillary signs point to the right? From Michael.Paoli at cal.berkeley.edu Sun Aug 7 09:04:22 2016 From: Michael.Paoli at cal.berkeley.edu (Michael Paoli) Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2016 09:04:22 -0700 Subject: [buug] Test! In-Reply-To: <20160807023008.23840.3AEF6D88@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> References: <20160807023008.23840.3AEF6D88@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> Message-ID: <20160807090422.16591s9ed56bgtfk@webmail.rawbw.com> > From: "Ian Zimmerman" > Subject: [buug] Test! > Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 19:31:22 -0700 > This posting is different. Will it matter to the list manager? Hmmm, not sure - perhaps/probably not an issue. I received it okay. Is the base64 encoding really needed though? Wouldn't plain text ASCII, or quoted printable generally suffice, and make for easier backward compatibility with anyone using some old/ancient email client? Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail1.rawbw.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 Received: from ees-sentrion-ucb3.berkeley.edu (ees-sentrion-ucb3.berkeley.edu [169.229.218.242]) by mail1.rawbw.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id u772WXMc034796 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 19:32:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from buug-bounces at buug.org) Received: from ees-ppworker-prod-03.ist.berkeley.edu (ees-ppworker-prod-03.ist.berkeley.edu [169.229.218.209]) by ees-sentrion-ucb3.berkeley.edu (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id u772WUUx032385 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 6 Aug 2016 19:32:31 -0700 Received: from pps.filterd (ees-ppworker-prod-03.ist.berkeley.edu [127.0.0.1]) by ees-ppworker-prod-03.ist.berkeley.edu (8.15.0.59/8.15.0.59) with SMTP id u772Slvi014861; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 19:32:30 -0700 Received: from acedia.primate.net (disorder.primate.net [198.144.194.12]) by ees-ppworker-prod-03.ist.berkeley.edu with ESMTP id 24nnyc9cup-1 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 06 Aug 2016 19:32:29 -0700 Received: from acedia.primate.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by acedia.primate.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-4) with ESMTP id u772VjVK005637; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 19:31:55 -0700 Received: from acedia.primate.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by acedia.primate.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-4) with ESMTPS id u772VXnQ005525 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 19:31:43 -0700 Received: (from itz at localhost) by acedia.primate.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u772VNjC005459 for buug at buug.org; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 19:31:23 -0700 Received: from [10.8.78.14] (helo=matica.foolinux.mooo.com) by ahiker.mooo.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bWDs2-0005NT-Lj for buug at buug.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 19:31:22 -0700 Received: from itz by matica.foolinux.mooo.com with local (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1bWDs2-0006DU-Gm for buug at buug.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 19:31:22 -0700 Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 19:31:22 -0700 From: Ian Zimmerman To: buug at buug.org Message-ID: <20160807023008.23840.3AEF6D88 at matica.foolinux.mooo.com> Mail-Followup-To: buug at buug.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Subject: [buug] Test! X-BeenThere: buug at buug.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: buug at buug.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Errors-To: buug-bounces at buug.org Sender: "buug" X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5800 definitions=8249 signatures=670731 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=default_inbound_spam_policy_notspam policy=default_inbound_spam_policy score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1603290000 definitions=main-1608070030 X-UCB-Notice: This message has been processed by a spam tagging system. X-Proofpoint-Spambar: VGhpcyBwb3N0aW5nIGlzIGRpZmZlcmVudC4gIFdpbGwgaXQgbWF0dGVyIHRvIHRoZSBsaXN0IG1h bmFnZXI/CgotLSAKUGxlYXNlICpubyogcHJpdmF0ZSBDYzogb24gbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0cyBhbmQg bmV3c2dyb3VwcwpXaHkgZG9lcyB0aGUgYXJyb3cgb24gSGlsbGFyeSBzaWducyBwb2ludCB0byB0 aGUgcmlnaHQ/Cl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f CmJ1dWcgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0CmJ1dWdAYnV1Zy5vcmcKaHR0cDovL2J1dWcub3JnL2NnaS1iaW4v bWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9idXVnCg== From itz at buug.org Sun Aug 7 10:29:38 2016 From: itz at buug.org (Ian Zimmerman) Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 10:29:38 -0700 Subject: [buug] Test! In-Reply-To: <20160807090422.16591s9ed56bgtfk@webmail.rawbw.com> References: <20160807023008.23840.3AEF6D88@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> <20160807090422.16591s9ed56bgtfk@webmail.rawbw.com> Message-ID: <20160807171226.4239.14492476@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> On 2016-08-07 09:04 -0700, Michael Paoli wrote: > > This posting is different. Will it matter to the list manager? > > Hmmm, not sure - perhaps/probably not an issue. I received it okay. The point of the test was that I stopped passing -f to sendmail, which I expected to result in the envelope sender being different from the subscribed address. And indeed that's what happened when I later did the same on a different mailing list (and it worked there, too). I am unsure if I should do the test on all of my ~30 subscribed lists. In this case, though, I forgot that the list serving host and the submission host were the same :-) [1] so there was no SMTP hop at this stage, and no opportunity for the envelope to be rewritten. > Is the base64 encoding really needed though? Wouldn't > plain text ASCII, or quoted printable generally suffice, and > make for easier backward compatibility with anyone using some > old/ancient email client? I believe I am innocent here. The local copy saved by mutt is indeed plain ASCII, unencoded. It must be the list server doing that, possibly only in cases of local submission. [1] acedia.primate.net -- Please *no* private Cc: on mailing lists and newsgroups Why does the arrow on Hillary signs point to the right? From Michael.Paoli at cal.berkeley.edu Sun Aug 7 11:13:47 2016 From: Michael.Paoli at cal.berkeley.edu (Michael Paoli) Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2016 11:13:47 -0700 Subject: [buug] Test! (& base64 encoding) In-Reply-To: <20160807171226.4239.14492476@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> References: <20160807023008.23840.3AEF6D88@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> <20160807090422.16591s9ed56bgtfk@webmail.rawbw.com> <20160807171226.4239.14492476@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> Message-ID: <20160807111347.43671bw5wajwm0zo@webmail.rawbw.com> Yes, might be the list, ... or something else along the chain that did that encoding. I didn't/don't exactly get it straight SMTP from listserver to my inbox/mbox, so also possible something along there might have changed that, and that might also be conditional upon content (e.g. may only be under certain circumstances that it triggers that (re)encoding of the content. > From: "Ian Zimmerman" > Subject: Re: [buug] Test! > Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 10:29:38 -0700 > On 2016-08-07 09:04 -0700, Michael Paoli wrote: > >> Is the base64 encoding really needed though? Wouldn't >> plain text ASCII, or quoted printable generally suffice, and >> make for easier backward compatibility with anyone using some >> old/ancient email client? > > I believe I am innocent here. The local copy saved by mutt is indeed > plain ASCII, unencoded. It must be the list server doing that, possibly > only in cases of local submission. From itz at buug.org Sun Aug 7 11:19:30 2016 From: itz at buug.org (Ian Zimmerman) Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 11:19:30 -0700 Subject: [buug] Free beer, functional, non-Google webmail Message-ID: <20160807181340.6057.2EE104F0@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> Is there any? By non-Google, of course I also mean non-Yahoo, non-Microsoft, etc. For a while I was happy with tutanota [1] but their latest version is broken on my mobile device, both the "app" and in the browser. And of course that is precisely the use case I need this for. [1] https://tutanota.com -- Please *no* private Cc: on mailing lists and newsgroups Why does the arrow on Hillary signs point to the right? From ludovic at mozilla.com Sun Aug 7 13:05:10 2016 From: ludovic at mozilla.com (Ludovic Hirlimann) Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 22:05:10 +0200 Subject: [buug] Free beer, functional, non-Google webmail In-Reply-To: <20160807181340.6057.2EE104F0@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> References: <20160807181340.6057.2EE104F0@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> Message-ID: <86e30d63-c4c4-74b1-c7df-42b1074741a5@mozilla.com> fast.fm ? On 07/08/2016 20:19, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > Is there any? > > By non-Google, of course I also mean non-Yahoo, non-Microsoft, etc. For > a while I was happy with tutanota [1] but their latest version is broken > on my mobile device, both the "app" and in the browser. And of course > that is precisely the use case I need this for. > > [1] > https://tutanota.com > -- :Usul in #moc on irc.mozilla.org Mozilla Operation Center <3 ipv6 , <3 Gaming , <3 OSS http://sietch-tabr.tumblr.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 213 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From rick at linuxmafia.com Sun Aug 7 16:38:43 2016 From: rick at linuxmafia.com (Rick Moen) Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 16:38:43 -0700 Subject: [buug] Free beer, functional, non-Google webmail In-Reply-To: <20160807181340.6057.2EE104F0@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> References: <20160807181340.6057.2EE104F0@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> Message-ID: <20160807233843.GN20608@linuxmafia.com> Quoting Ian Zimmerman (itz at buug.org): > Is there any? > > By non-Google, of course I also mean non-Yahoo, non-Microsoft, etc. For > a while I was happy with tutanota [1] but their latest version is broken > on my mobile device, both the "app" and in the browser. And of course > that is precisely the use case I need this for. 1. Run your own mail. 2. Use your choice of offerings in 'Webmail' on http://linuxmafia.com/kb/Mail/ to provide the Web interface. Many people seem to like RoundCube. (I sure wish it weren't PHP, though.) From itz at buug.org Sun Aug 7 18:04:06 2016 From: itz at buug.org (Ian Zimmerman) Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 18:04:06 -0700 Subject: [buug] Free beer, functional, non-Google webmail In-Reply-To: <20160807233843.GN20608@linuxmafia.com> References: <20160807181340.6057.2EE104F0@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> <20160807233843.GN20608@linuxmafia.com> Message-ID: <20160808005623.3680.18A6D46E@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> On 2016-08-07 16:38 -0700, Rick Moen wrote: > 1. Run your own mail. Sure, I do already. Have done so for a long time. > 2. Use your choice of offerings in 'Webmail' on > http://linuxmafia.com/kb/Mail/ to provide the Web interface. Trouble is, I don't want to run a webserver. prayer almost fits the bill because it is standalone, but still requires an IMAP server while now I get by nicely with just syncing the store and reading mail locally. And, in my (admittedly short) experience, you can't safely mix the two modes (local and IMAP) on the same store, so I would have to complicate matters further by copying the mail I want to read via IMAP to a separate place. -- Please *no* private Cc: on mailing lists and newsgroups Why does the arrow on Hillary signs point to the right? From rick at linuxmafia.com Sun Aug 7 18:45:20 2016 From: rick at linuxmafia.com (Rick Moen) Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 18:45:20 -0700 Subject: [buug] Free beer, functional, non-Google webmail In-Reply-To: <20160808005623.3680.18A6D46E@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> References: <20160807181340.6057.2EE104F0@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> <20160807233843.GN20608@linuxmafia.com> <20160808005623.3680.18A6D46E@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> Message-ID: <20160808014520.GP20608@linuxmafia.com> Quoting Ian Zimmerman (itz at buug.org): > Sure, I do already. Have done so for a long time. I was just saying that because others seemed to think you were looking to outsource to a webmail service. > Trouble is, I don't want to run a webserver. Webmail without a Web server? Ah, OK, you want a single piece of software that is an integrated ('standalone') webmail+httpd thing? How 'bout you configure nginx or Lighttpd to offer only webmail serviced by RoundCube or Prayer or whatever you prefer, and _pretend_ that it arrived integrated? ;-> > prayer almost fits the bill because it is standalone, but still requires > an IMAP server while now I get by nicely with just syncing the store and > reading mail locally. I see that it's in C and functions as an HTTP to IMAP gateway. Need to add that to the Webmail page in my knowledgebase. Thanks. Your choices may be further constrained by your preference in file format for local mail on your MTA, i.e., Maildir vs mbox. OpenWebmail (http://openwebmail.org/) can read mbox files directly without needing an IMAPd. It does need an httpd, though, and is written in Perl. From exequeryphil at gmail.com Sun Aug 7 21:13:41 2016 From: exequeryphil at gmail.com (Philip) Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 21:13:41 -0700 Subject: [buug] Free beer, functional, non-Google webmail In-Reply-To: <20160807181340.6057.2EE104F0@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> References: <20160807181340.6057.2EE104F0@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> Message-ID: https://lumail.lu/ I've used this before. On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > Is there any? > > By non-Google, of course I also mean non-Yahoo, non-Microsoft, etc. For > a while I was happy with tutanota [1] but their latest version is broken > on my mobile device, both the "app" and in the browser. And of course > that is precisely the use case I need this for. > > [1] > https://tutanota.com > > -- > Please *no* private Cc: on mailing lists and newsgroups > Why does the arrow on Hillary signs point to the right? > _______________________________________________ > buug mailing list > buug at buug.org > http://buug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/buug > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Michael.Paoli at cal.berkeley.edu Mon Aug 15 07:40:52 2016 From: Michael.Paoli at cal.berkeley.edu (Michael Paoli) Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 07:40:52 -0700 Subject: [buug] BALUG: Meeting: Tomorrow Tu 2016-08-16; & other BALUG News Message-ID: <20160815074052.205010ovhx3x8k1w@webmail.rawbw.com> BALUG: Meeting: Tomorrow Tu 2016-08-16; & other BALUG News ------------------------------ items, details further below: BALUG meeting Tu 2016-08-16 giveaways (Books & other titles, CDs/DVDs, ...) Upcoming BALUG list changes?! help BALUG! :-) - volunteering, venue, ... Twitter https://twitter.com/#!/BALUG_org ------------------------------ For our 2016-08-16 BALUG meeting: At least presently we don't have a specific speaker/presentation lined up for this meeting, but that doesn't prevent us from having interesting and exciting meetings and discussions. Sometimes we also manage to secure/confirm a speaker too late for us to announce or fully publicize the speaker (that's happened at least twice in the past). Got questions, answers, and/or opinions? We typically have some expert(s) and/or relative expert(s) present to cover Linux and related topic areas. Want to hear some interesting discussions on LINUX and other topics? Show up at the meeting, and feel free to bring an agenda if you wish. Want to help ensure BALUG has speakers/presentations lined up for future meetings? Help refer speakers to us and/or volunteer to be one of the speaker coordinators. Great food and people, and interesting conversations to be had. So, if you'd like to join us please RSVP to: rsvp at balug.org **Why RSVP??** Well, don't worry we won't turn you away, but the RSVPs really help BALUG and our venue plan for the meeting and accommodations, so please let us know. 6:30pm Tuesday, August 16th, 2016 2016-08-16 Henry's Hunan Restaurant 110 Natoma St. (between 2nd & New Montgomery) San Francisco, CA 94105-3704 1-415-546-4999 http://www.henryshunanrestaurant.com/ Easy Transit/Parking Access: short walk from BART, MUNI, parking Trip planning: http://www.511.org/ Delicious Hunan cuisine and reasonably priced. Meeting Details... Cost/Dining: The meetings are always free, but dinner is not (unless you are our guest speaker, in which case we also treat you to dinner). For Henry's Hunan Restaurant, if folks are agreeable, we'll share and dine "family" style, and split up the costs, and typical cost per person including tax and tip (but not including beverages beyond complementary tea) would be in the $13.00 to $17.50 range, and commonly around $15.00 to $16.50. Cash may be preferred to ease splitting up the check. One can also specifically order the dish(es) one needs/prefers (e.g. for dietary considerations) - and we also commonly order some dish(es) that may meet various dietary considerations) (e.g. vegetarian, non-pork, ...). Please arrive by 7:00 P.M., we expect to order entrees at that time, and may order appetizer(s) and/or soup(s) anytime after 6:30 P.M. ------------------------------ We typically have various giveaway items at BALUG meetings. We'll likely have at least the below plus additional items. Books and other titles! have a look/read here: https://www.wiki.balug.org/wiki/doku.php?id=balug:books_and_publications CDs/DVDs/ISOs, etc. - have a peek here: http://www.wiki.balug.org/wiki/doku.php?id=balug:cds_and_images_etc We may also be able to "burn" images per request or copy to USB flash, etc. Donations of blank or +-RW media, USB flash, or funding thereof, also appreciated. See the above URL for details (and the inventory (qty.) of what we specifically have "burned" and available on-hand does also frequently change). ------------------------------ Upcoming BALUG list changes?! Yes, for the past many years, much of BALUG, including our lists, has been and is still presently hosted on DreamHost.com. We will be changing that in the not-too-horribly-distant-future. (primary volunteer on this has been buried under some other stuff to attend to, so taking a bit longer.) We'll update on status when that's about to change and when it does change. We'll provide more details as we approach and go through that transition, and we'll make it as painless as feasible. ------------------------------ help BALUG! :-) - volunteering, venue ... You can do useful and cool stuff volunteering to help BALUG, e.g. following up on many leads for possible venue, among many other possibilities. Quite a variety of opportunities to help BALUG. Come talk to us at a meeting and/or drop us a note at: balug-contact at balug.org These opportunities may include, among other possibilities: o venue arrangement (e.g. followup on potential leads on-site coordination/preparations), see also: http://lists.balug.org/pipermail/balug-admin-balug.org/2014-July/001504.html o chief/assistant cat herder o assist on speaker coordination/procurement, etc. o assist on publicity o Linux Systems Administration (e.g. do/assist/learn, with/under some quite experienced and skilled Linux systems administrator(s)). o webmaster, assistant webmaster, designer, graphic artist o archivist/history/retrieval/etc. o and other various/miscellaneous tasks BALUG would like to be doing (also feel free to suggest ideas!) ------------------------------ From itz at buug.org Tue Aug 16 14:47:51 2016 From: itz at buug.org (Ian Zimmerman) Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 14:47:51 -0700 Subject: [buug] GPG signing? In-Reply-To: <20160804233648.13146vakqe1zo1es@webmail.rawbw.com> References: <20160804164736.6616.14F27334@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> <20160804233648.13146vakqe1zo1es@webmail.rawbw.com> Message-ID: <20160816214616.28205.28838C32@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> On 2016-08-04 23:36 -0700, Michael Paoli wrote: > Sorry I wasn't able to make it ... earlier today was hoping I would. > > There is also, biglumber.com, and also the > Bay Area Keysigning list: > http://zer0.org/mailman/listinfo/ba-keysign/ I signed up with biglumber, thanks. I'll have my key info again this Thursday, hoping you can come :) -- Please *no* private Cc: on mailing lists and newsgroups Why does the arrow on Hillary signs point to the right? From Michael.Paoli at cal.berkeley.edu Tue Aug 16 17:57:03 2016 From: Michael.Paoli at cal.berkeley.edu (Michael Paoli) Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 17:57:03 -0700 Subject: [buug] GPG signing? ... :-) In-Reply-To: <20160816214616.28205.28838C32@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> References: <20160804164736.6616.14F27334@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> <20160804233648.13146vakqe1zo1es@webmail.rawbw.com> <20160816214616.28205.28838C32@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> Message-ID: <20160816175703.17515j4tuvogz280@webmail.rawbw.com> Yes, I expect to be at BUUG this Thursday :-) Will also be at BALUG this evening (on my way there now). > From: "Ian Zimmerman" > Subject: Re: [buug] GPG signing? > Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 14:47:51 -0700 > On 2016-08-04 23:36 -0700, Michael Paoli wrote: > >> Sorry I wasn't able to make it ... earlier today was hoping I would. >> >> There is also, biglumber.com, and also the >> Bay Area Keysigning list: >> http://zer0.org/mailman/listinfo/ba-keysign/ > > I signed up with biglumber, thanks. > > I'll have my key info again this Thursday, hoping you can come :) From Michael.Paoli at cal.berkeley.edu Mon Aug 22 21:32:53 2016 From: Michael.Paoli at cal.berkeley.edu (Michael Paoli) Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 21:32:53 -0700 Subject: [buug] Free beer, functional, non-Google webmail ... https://protonmail.com/ ? In-Reply-To: <20160807181340.6057.2EE104F0@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> References: <20160807181340.6057.2EE104F0@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> Message-ID: <20160822213253.107316zmlhnqgu00@webmail.rawbw.com> Depending what one wants to do, this one might be worth checking out: https://protonmail.com/ It's not your basic SMTP/POP/IMAP, but it might be a way to do things pretty darn securely. > From: "Ian Zimmerman" > Subject: [buug] Free beer, functional, non-Google webmail > Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 11:19:30 -0700 > Is there any? > > By non-Google, of course I also mean non-Yahoo, non-Microsoft, etc. For > a while I was happy with tutanota [1] but their latest version is broken > on my mobile device, both the "app" and in the browser. And of course > that is precisely the use case I need this for. > > [1] > https://tutanota.com From itz at primate.net Fri Aug 26 11:57:05 2016 From: itz at primate.net (Ian Zimmerman) Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:57:05 -0700 Subject: [buug] Free beer, functional, non-Google webmail ... https://protonmail.com/ ? In-Reply-To: <20160822213253.107316zmlhnqgu00@webmail.rawbw.com> References: <20160807181340.6057.2EE104F0@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> <20160822213253.107316zmlhnqgu00@webmail.rawbw.com> Message-ID: <20160826180202.10452.349552D6@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> On 2016-08-22 21:32, Michael Paoli wrote: > https://protonmail.com/ Right, that is almost the same thing as tutanota, but maybe better done (still some connection to www, and not a pure "app" using http as a transport). I'll keep it as Plan C :-). But meanwhile, I set up a whitelist on primate.net and I put whitelisted mail I get there into the IMAP box, then reading it on my mobile with k9mail. I'll see how reliable k9mail is this time. Also it's unclear if the advantage in security will last: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-europe-attacks-france-germany-idUSKCN10Y174 -- Please *no* private Cc: on mailing lists and newsgroups Why does the arrow on Hillary signs point to the right?