[buug] Falling back to gcc 2.95
jan at caustic.org
Tue Mar 5 14:57:06 PST 2002
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, wfhoney at pacbell.net wrote:
> I'm building a server for work and in our collective wisdom, we decided to
> build mysql from source.
> On www.mysql.com we saw a warning about using gcc 2.96 as follows:
> "We recommend that MySQL be compiled with gcc 2.95"
> ...due to stability issues.
2.96 is not intended for real "production use". it's (this is my
understanding) a test piece of software, and wasn't for distrobution.
redhat did so anyway, and pretty much screwed many of their customers.
> I installed (forced) the following:
> and then typed:
> # gcc -v
> ...and got back...
> gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (release)
did you try to compile a small "hello world" program?
there's a few dozen examples out there, i'd suggest digging up a simple
test program, and trying to compile it. just because the compiler can
execute, doesn't mean it can produce an executable.
> But when I begin configuring mysql, I slam against the following wall:
> checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) works... no
> configure: error: installation or configuration problem:
> C compiler cannot create executables.
> This is one of those places in life when actually knowing what you're
> doing really would help :-)
consider this an opertunity to learn :)
first thing, what's the build environment like?
do you have your libraries all ok? does ldconfig give you useful
> Thanks for sticking with me this far, reading this wannabe stuff.
sure. i hope i can help some.
-------/ f. johan beisser /--------------------------------------+
http://caustic.org/~jan jan at caustic.org
"John Ashcroft is really just the reanimated corpse
of J. Edgar Hoover." -- Tim Triche
More information about the buug